<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>
            <![CDATA[ Pandemic triggered a flurry of activities in India's Tech for Good ecosystem ]]>
        </title>
        <link>
            <![CDATA[ https://www.frontlist.in/%20https://www.frontlist.in/public/index.php/pandemic-triggered-a-flurry-of-activities-in-indias-tech-for-good-ecosystem ]]>
        </link>
        <description>
            <![CDATA[ The pandemic has triggered a flurry of activities around cost-effective innovations in India’s Tech for Good ecosystem, says a report published by Nasscom Foundation in partnership with CGI on Wednesday.

The report prepared with inputs from 548 organisations, comprising 119 established companies, 124 social enterprises/startups, and 305 NGOs, found that over 90% of these respondents were already developing or have plans to develop Technology for Social Good.

On average, 30 employees (full time and part time) were involved in a company’s Tech for Good practice per year. Also, a company on average invested $36,515, in addition to its CSR contributions, on Tech for Good. Most companies (57%) engaged in long term Tech for Good projects spanning for more than a year, as per the report.

The Tech for Good activities were not only in harmony with the companies' business strategy but they were fully aligned with it (66.38%). Also, they were more aligned with local causes (55.26%) than global causes (42.98%).

<em><strong>Lack of Funds (92.6%) was one of the biggest challenges for social enterprises, followed by lack of internet and mobile connectivity at the ground level (76.10%), found the study.</strong></em>
<div id=div-gpt-ad-1552914402102-0 class=dfp-ad Inarticle data-google-query-id=CJrd1d_D2u8CFcrQlgodgAEBjQ>
<div id=google_ads_iframe_/22390678/Hindu_Desktop_Inarticle_1x1_0__container__><span style=text-transform: initial>Education at 56.9% received the most Tech for Good focus followed by Livelihoods development at 50.43% and Big Data was being used by 87% of companies to create education-based Tech for Good.</span></div>
</div>
While mobile apps (81.36%) and web apps (84.48%) ruled the tech for good development space as the most preferred technology, Artificial Intelligence (64.10%), Big Data (54.78%) and Cloud (72.65%) were also growing.

The study also exposed a significant skills gap for the NGOs across all technologies. However, a large number of NGOs pivoted fast and created new Tech for Good solutions around remote work and remote education.

Nasscom Foundation CEO Ashok Pamidi said, “India is a hotbed of innovation and it is also the world’s largest sandbox to try out innovative technologies and models. Of late, we have seen technology companies focussing on developing high-end Tech for Good that can help solve numerous of the country's problems. Yet, Tech-based transformations at scale remain notoriously elusive as most of these innovations are piecemeal activities done in silos.” ]]>
        </description>
        <language>en</language>
        <pubDate>Wed, 03 31, 2021 12:31 pm</pubDate>
        <item>
            <title>
                <![CDATA[ Pandemic triggered a flurry of activities in India's Tech for Good ecosystem ]]>
            </title>
            <link><![CDATA[ https://www.frontlist.in/%20https://www.frontlist.in/public/index.php/pandemic-triggered-a-flurry-of-activities-in-indias-tech-for-good-ecosystem ]]></link>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[ The pandemic has triggered a flurry of activities around cost-effective innovations in India’s Tech for Good ecosystem, says a report published by Nasscom Foundation in partnership with CGI on Wednesday.

The report prepared with inputs from 548 organisations, comprising 119 established companies, 124 social enterprises/startups, and 305 NGOs, found that over 90% of these respondents were already developing or have plans to develop Technology for Social Good.

On average, 30 employees (full time and part time) were involved in a company’s Tech for Good practice per year. Also, a company on average invested $36,515, in addition to its CSR contributions, on Tech for Good. Most companies (57%) engaged in long term Tech for Good projects spanning for more than a year, as per the report.

The Tech for Good activities were not only in harmony with the companies' business strategy but they were fully aligned with it (66.38%). Also, they were more aligned with local causes (55.26%) than global causes (42.98%).

<em><strong>Lack of Funds (92.6%) was one of the biggest challenges for social enterprises, followed by lack of internet and mobile connectivity at the ground level (76.10%), found the study.</strong></em>
<div id=div-gpt-ad-1552914402102-0 class=dfp-ad Inarticle data-google-query-id=CJrd1d_D2u8CFcrQlgodgAEBjQ>
<div id=google_ads_iframe_/22390678/Hindu_Desktop_Inarticle_1x1_0__container__><span style=text-transform: initial>Education at 56.9% received the most Tech for Good focus followed by Livelihoods development at 50.43% and Big Data was being used by 87% of companies to create education-based Tech for Good.</span></div>
</div>
While mobile apps (81.36%) and web apps (84.48%) ruled the tech for good development space as the most preferred technology, Artificial Intelligence (64.10%), Big Data (54.78%) and Cloud (72.65%) were also growing.

The study also exposed a significant skills gap for the NGOs across all technologies. However, a large number of NGOs pivoted fast and created new Tech for Good solutions around remote work and remote education.

Nasscom Foundation CEO Ashok Pamidi said, “India is a hotbed of innovation and it is also the world’s largest sandbox to try out innovative technologies and models. Of late, we have seen technology companies focussing on developing high-end Tech for Good that can help solve numerous of the country's problems. Yet, Tech-based transformations at scale remain notoriously elusive as most of these innovations are piecemeal activities done in silos.” ]]>
            </description>
            <category>News</category>
            <author>
                <![CDATA[ Frontlist ]]>
            </author>
            <guid>2</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 31, 2021 12:31 pm</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
